Is it time for cruise ships to have lifeguards?

by Mike Rogers, Lifeguard Times

In the wake of several recent near-drownings of cruise ship passengers, many are asking why most cruise lines do not have lifeguards protecting their patrons. As many of the new “mega cruise ships” feature many water-themed recreational facilities, the adequate staffing of lifeguards monitoring those areas would seem to be a foregone conclusion.

What is the reasoning behind cruise lines not having lifeguards protecting cruise goers? Not having to train and pay additional staff is a potential reason. Also, potential liability is another consideration.

By not having lifeguards and simply posting “No Lifeguard On Duty” and/or “Swim At Your Own Risk” signs, cruise lines are making a calculated conclusion that if you tell patrons that they are “on their own” that if something goes wrong, their company is not at fault and has no liability and cannot be sued.

There is also the fact that many cruise lines operate in international waters and are non-US entities. This fact allows them to not have to be subject to the same rules, regulations and safety guidelines as US companies.

Time will tell if cruise lines can endure the negative publicity and litigation that accompany these tragic occurrences that could be all but eliminated by the employment of lifeguards. ╚

Visit the links below to find out more about the lack of lifeguards posted on cruise ships:

“Near-drowning on Royal Caribbean cruise raises concerns about lack of lifeguards”

“Live Life Less Ordinary, Be a Cruise Ship Lifeguard”

“No Lifeguards for Children on Cruise Ships? Maritime Law Encourages Cruise Lines to Act Irresponsibly”